<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Real-Life MS Project: Delays (the good kind&#8230;)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html</link>
	<description>The online home of Alex Brown, project management expert</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:50:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alex Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html#comment-1009</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 23:14:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html#comment-1009</guid>
		<description>Steve, you have a strange situation. Usually a milestone does not jump that way. If there were resources attached, I would say, "Look at the calendars for the resource." One thing to check in this situation is the "Task Calendar" field. It is possible for a task without resources to still get attached to a specific calendar. Usually you want this field to be blank, but if you have a calendar listed there, it could be forcing the milestone to jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you have a strange situation. Usually a milestone does not jump that way. If there were resources attached, I would say, &#8220;Look at the calendars for the resource.&#8221; One thing to check in this situation is the &#8220;Task Calendar&#8221; field. It is possible for a task without resources to still get attached to a specific calendar. Usually you want this field to be blank, but if you have a calendar listed there, it could be forcing the milestone to jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gibbons</title>
		<link>http://www.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html#comment-972</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gibbons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wp.alexsbrown.com/msproj-delays.html#comment-972</guid>
		<description>I was following your article on Delays - the good kind.
I decided to use a leveling delay edays to get a milestone on the date I wanted it instead of a "must finish on" constraint. I found that for every unit of edays it moved one day, except when I was getting close to the date I wanted, then one eday moved it about 3 days. I had removed the must finish on constraing and there were no resources assigned, and it wasn't even linked. I was using Project 2002. I didn't have time to try an isolate the cause. Do you know anything about this?

I enjoy your web page.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was following your article on Delays - the good kind.<br />
I decided to use a leveling delay edays to get a milestone on the date I wanted it instead of a &#8220;must finish on&#8221; constraint. I found that for every unit of edays it moved one day, except when I was getting close to the date I wanted, then one eday moved it about 3 days. I had removed the must finish on constraing and there were no resources assigned, and it wasn&#8217;t even linked. I was using Project 2002. I didn&#8217;t have time to try an isolate the cause. Do you know anything about this?</p>
<p>I enjoy your web page.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.321 seconds -->
